More on Simpson’s paradox and the analysis of memory retrieval

Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 31 (4):326-328 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A common way of analyzing the statistical relation between two tests of memory is to use contingency analyses. A potential problem with such analyses is known as Simpson’s paradox. The paradox is that collapsing two or more contingency tables may have the effect that the relationship expressed in the overall contingency table differs from the relationships expressed in the original tables. The paradox arises when covariates are correlated with each of the tests. It has been claimed that the paradox has implications for the analysis of memory retrieval, and ways of solving the problem have been called for (Hintzman, 1980). In this paper, partial gamma (Davis, 1967) is suggested as one possible solution. This method can be used to compute a weighted average of the results in the original tables. The use of partial gamma is exemplified by applying it to hypothetical instances of Simpson’s paradox.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Probabilistic causality and Simpson's paradox.Richard Otte - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (1):110-125.
Logic of Simpson paradox.Jacek Malinowski - 2005 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 14 (2):203-210.
Interactive alignment: Priming or memory retrieval?Michael Kaschak & Arthur Glenberg - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):201-202.
Attention demands of memory retrieval.Steven W. Keele - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 93 (2):245.
Encoding and retrieval in visual memory tasks.Nancy Frost - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 95 (2):317.
Cartwright and Otte on Simpson's paradox.Ellery Eells - 1987 - Philosophy of Science 54 (2):233-243.
The role of images within the memory system: Storage or retrieval?Lowell D. Groninger - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (1):178.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-22

Downloads
28 (#573,323)

6 months
7 (#440,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Structure of memory traces.Endel Tulving & Michael J. Watkins - 1975 - Psychological Review 82 (4):261-275.
On testing the independence of associations.Douglas L. Hintzman - 1972 - Psychological Review 79 (3):261-264.
Simpson's paradox resolved: A reply to Hintzman.Edwin Martin - 1981 - Psychological Review 88 (4):372-374.

Add more references