La argumentación judicial: control y responsabilidad de los órganos jurisdiccionales

Telos: Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios Utilitaristas 18 (1):197-229 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper takes as starting point the relative indeterminateness of current legal systems. This circumstance determines from the point of view of judicial activity a substantial freedom for judges, which translates into the existence of different interpretive possibilities. For this reason the role of argumentationin judicial activity has been reinforced, but at the same time the question arises of how to control the judges and what kind of responsibility they have in exercising their functions

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Understanding judicial discretion.Barry Hoffmaster - 1982 - Law and Philosophy 1 (1):21 - 55.
Formal aspects of Legal reasoning.A. Soeteman - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):731-746.
The Responsible judge: readings in judicial ethics.John Thomas Noonan & Kenneth I. Winston (eds.) - 1993 - Westport, Conn.: Praeger.
Democracy and judicial review: are they really incompatible?Annabelle Lever - 2007 - Public Law:280-298.
The Past, Present ... and Future(?) of Judicial Ethics Education in Canada.Richard Devlin, C. Adèle Kent & Susan Lightstone - 2013 - Legal Ethics 16 (1):1-35.
Questioning Judicial Deliberations.Jan Komárek - 2009 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 29 (4):805-826.
Rights-based judicial review: A democratic justification. [REVIEW]Alon Harel - 2003 - Law and Philosophy 22 (s 3-4):247-276.
Limits of legality: the ethics of lawless judging.Jeffrey Brand-Ballard (ed.) - 2010 - New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
The Rise of Modern Judicial Review: From Judicial Interpretation to Judge-Made Law (2nd edition).Christopher Wolfe - 1994 - Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Do judges have an obligation to enforce the law?: moral responsibility and judicial reasoning.Anthony R. Reeves - 2010 - Law and Philosophy 29 (2):159-187.
Virtudes, argumentación jurídica y ética judicial.Amalia Amaya - 2011 - Dianoia 56 (67):135-142.
Is judicial review undemocratic?Annabelle Lever - 2009 - Perspectives on Politics 7 (4):897-915.
Judicial review: a practising judge's perspective.S. Breyer - 1999 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 19 (2):153-166.
The constitutional court's decision in the dispute between the supreme court and the judicial commission: Banishing judicial accountability?Simon Butt - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-26

Downloads
33 (#487,172)

6 months
4 (#798,951)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references