If One Can’t Lose Such a Right in These Circumstances, One Never Had It in the First Place

Criminal Law and Philosophy 16 (3):503-509 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article, I press a line of objection to Jonathan Quong's moral status account of liability to defensive harm. The claim on which I rest my critique is captured by the article's title: if one can’t lose such a right in these circumstances, one never had it in the first place.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Winning the Argument?Danny Frederick - 2020 - In Against the Philosophical Tide. Yeovil: Critias Publishing. pp. 195-197.
The lottery paradox, knowledge, and rationality.Dana K. Nelkin - 2000 - Philosophical Review 109 (3):373-409.
Hume and Rawls on the Circumstances and Priority of Justice.Lister Andrew - 2005 - History of Political Thought 26 (4):664-695.
Integrity and Self-Protection.Carolyn McLeod - 2004 - Journal of Social Philosophy 35 (2):216–232.
On the circumstances of justice.Adam J. Tebble - 2016 - European Journal of Political Theory:147488511666419.
Liability, culpability, and luck.Dana Kay Nelkin - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (11):3523-3541.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-06-30

Downloads
40 (#400,484)

6 months
15 (#171,570)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Otsuka
Rutgers - New Brunswick

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references