A Diagrammatic Notation for Visualizing Epistemic Entities and Relations

Scientonomy 4:87–139 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper presents a diagrammatic notation for visualizing epistemic entities and relations. The notation was created during the Visualizing Worldviews project funded by the University of Toronto’s Jackman Humanities Institute and has been further developed by the scholars participating in the university’s Research Opportunity Program. Since any systematic diagrammatic notation should be based on a solid ontology of the respective domain, we first outline the current state of the scientonomic ontology. We then proceed to providing diagrammatic tools for visualizing the epistemic entities and relations of this ontology. These basic diagramming techniques allow us to construct diagrams of various types for both synchronic and diachronic visualizations. The paper concludes by highlighting some future research directions. As the notation presented here is de facto accepted and used in scientonomy, the paper suggests no modifications.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-03-01

Downloads
326 (#62,949)

6 months
249 (#9,798)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Hakob Barseghyan
University of Toronto, St. George
Paul Edward Patton
University of Toronto, St. George Campus
Torin Doppelt
Queen's University (PhD)
2 more

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Introduction to Higher Order Categorical Logic.J. Lambek & P. J. Scott - 1989 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (3):1113-1114.
The Einstein-podolsky-Rosen argument in quantum theory.Arthur Fine - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Laws of Scientific Change.Hakob Barseghyan - 2015 - Cham: Imprint: Springer.
Deontic Logic.Risto Hilpinen - 2017 - In Lou Goble (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Philosophical Logic. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 159–182.

Add more references