The limits of authority and property, or, How not to argue for anarchism

Abstract

Anarchist theory assumes that non-hierarchically organised societies both possible and desirable. To show the former requires empirical evidence and a discussion of the theoretical preconditions of cooperation. To show the latter, it is necessary to show that the faults found with the state can be remedied within non-hierarchically ordered societies. One obvious condition for a successful anarchist theory is that the solutions to these separate tasks are mutually consistent. It is the aim of this thesis to show that the theories of Robert Paul Wolff and Robert Nozick are found wanting in this respect. Both their theories of agency rule out the possibility of non-coercive and stable cooperation, which is a necessary precondition for an anarchist society. I conclude with a brief discussion of Michael Taylor's communitarian proposal and defend it against the liberal.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,410

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-07

Downloads
17 (#874,373)

6 months
1 (#1,478,518)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Du Contrat social.J. Rousseau & Jean-Louis Lecercle - 1988 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 178 (3):334-335.
Legitimate Authority.Robert F. Ladenson - 1972 - American Philosophical Quarterly 9 (4):335 - 341.
The decline of Wolff's anarchism.James P. Sterba - 1977 - Journal of Value Inquiry 11 (3):213-217.

Add more references