An argument against Armstrong's analysis of the resemblance of universals

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75 (1):109 – 111 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This Article does not have an abstract

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,998

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Resemblance nominalism and counterparts.Alexander Bird - 2003 - Analysis 63 (3):221–228.
Paradigms and Russell's Resemblance Regress.Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra - 2004 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (4):644 – 651.
On universals: an extensionalist alternative to Quine’s resemblance theory. [REVIEW]Nathan Stemmer - 2005 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 38 (1):75 - 90.
Natural classes of universals: Why Armstrong's analysis fails.Lowell Friesen - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (2):285 – 296.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
68 (#239,944)

6 months
5 (#641,095)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Adam Pautz
Brown University

Citations of this work

Structural universals.A. R. J. Fisher - 2018 - Philosophy Compass 13 (10):e12518.
Indiscernible Universals.Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra - 2020 - Humanities Journal of Valparaiso 16:89-110.
Sellarsian Particulars.Matteo Morganti - 2012 - Acta Analytica 27 (3):293-306.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Abstract particulars.Keith Campbell - 1990 - Cambridge, Mass., USA: Blackwell.
Against structural universals.David K. Lewis - 1986 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64 (1):25 – 46.
In defence of structural universals.D. M. Armstrong - 1986 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64 (1):85 – 88.
Ways worlds could be.Peter Forrest - 1986 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64 (1):15 – 24.

View all 10 references / Add more references