A new reading and comparative interpretation of Gödel’s completeness (1930) and incompleteness (1931) theorems

Логико-Философские Штудии 13 (2):187-188 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Peano arithmetic cannot serve as the ground of mathematics for it is inconsistent to infinity, and infinity is necessary for its foundation. Though Peano arithmetic cannot be complemented by any axiom of infinity, there exists at least one (logical) axiomatics consistent to infinity. That is nothing else than a new reading at issue and comparative interpretation of Gödel’s papers (1930; 1931) meant here. Peano arithmetic admits anyway generalizations consistent to infinity and thus to some addable axiom(s) of infinity. The most utilized example of those generalizations is the complex Hilbert space. Any generalization of Peano arithmetic consistent to infinity, e.g. the complex Hilbert space, can serve as a foundation for mathematics to found itself and by itself.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Completeness: From Henkin's Proposition to Quantum Computer.Vasil Penchev - 2018 - Логико-Философские Штудии 16 (1-2):134-135.
Kurt Gödel, paper on the incompleteness theorems (1931).Richard Zach - 2004 - In Ivor Grattan-Guinness (ed.), Landmark Writings in Mathematics. North-Holland. pp. 917-925.
Gödel's incompleteness theorems.Raymond M. Smullyan - 1992 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Lou Goble.
Recursion theory for metamathematics.Raymond Merrill Smullyan - 1993 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Quantum Mathematics.J. Michael Dunn - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:512 - 531.
Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems.Panu Raatikainen - 2013 - The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2013 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (Ed.).
Gödel's incompleteness theorems and computer science.Roman Murawski - 1997 - Foundations of Science 2 (1):123-135.
Completeness and the Ends of Axiomatization.Michael Detlefsen - 2014 - In Juliette Cara Kennedy (ed.), Interpreting Gödel. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 59-77.
The gödel paradox and Wittgenstein's reasons.Francesco Berto - 2009 - Philosophia Mathematica 17 (2):208-219.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-05-28

Downloads
184 (#107,809)

6 months
67 (#72,724)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Vasil Penchev
Bulgarian Academy of Sciences

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references