Modern ideas about the object of scientific knowledge and bioethics

Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 12 (1-2):53-59 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The present article analyzes and outlines significant changes in ideas about the object of scientific knowledge in modern science. Special attention is paid to the transition to the paradigm of complexity, within which the object of scientific knowledge acquires a complex systemic character and remains in the same complex connections with systems of different levels. It is marked that such changes entail a number of methodological requirements, which are especially clearly manifested in modern theories of bioethics and its real practices. A special role in this case is assigned to issues of transdisciplinary approach, complementary methodology, and values of the subject of bioethical cognition. The prospects for further research are related to the possibilities of deepening the methodology of the paradigm of complexity based on the application of a transdisciplinary approach.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,410

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Knowledge of Man.V. G. Borzenkov & I. T. Frolov - 2000 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 39 (3):6-18.
Modern Cognitive Science.Oleg Backsanskiy - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 58:11-15.
Subject and Object in Scientific Realism.Howard Sankey - 2017 - In Paula Angelova, Jassen Andreev & Emil Lensky (eds.), Das Interpretative Universum. Wurzburg, Germany: Konigshausen & Neumann. pp. 293-306.
Quantification as a Process of Object-formation.Gernot Böhme - 1983 - der 16. Weltkongress Für Philosophie 2:218-225.
Interdisciplinary Bioethics on the Crossroad of Research Methods.Eliane Azevêdo - 2007 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 17 (2):34-34.
The Biological Roots of Knowledge.Oleg E. Backsansky - 2008 - Dialogue and Universalism 18 (11-12):227-231.
The Biological Roots of Knowledge.Oleg E. Backsansky - 2008 - Dialogue and Universalism 18 (11-12):227-231.
Interrelations Between Subject and Object in Perception.Song Lijun - 1984 - Chinese Studies in Philosophy 16 (1):48.
Transformation and deformation of scientific knowledge in connection with changes in society.A. A. Kartashova - 2015 - Liberal Arts in Russiaроссийский Гуманитарный Журналrossijskij Gumanitarnyj Žurnalrossijskij Gumanitaryj Zhurnalrossiiskii Gumanitarnyi Zhurnal 4 (5):347.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-07-01

Downloads
7 (#1,393,386)

6 months
4 (#798,692)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
Encyclopedia of bioethics.T. Recih Warren & T. Reich - forthcoming - Encyclopedia of Bioethics.

View all 11 references / Add more references