If You’re Not First, You’re Last: Are the Empirical Premises Correct in the Ethics of Anti-Doping?

&
Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 15 (4):495-506 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the ethical discussion of anti-doping, a number of normative arguments rely on empirical premises. The truth of these premises, however, often remains unverified. This article identifies several...

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/17511321.2020.1818277

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Philosophy on steroids: Why the anti-doping position could use a little enhancement.Brent M. Kious - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (4):213-234.
Moral Communities in Anti-Doping Policy: A Response to Bowers and Paternoster.Emmanuel Macedo, Matt Englar-Carlson, Tim Lehrbach & John Gleaves - 2017 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 13 (1):49-61.
Current anti-doping policy: a critical appraisal. [REVIEW]Bengt Kayser, Alexandre Mauron & Andy Miah - 2007 - BMC Medical Ethics 8 (1):2.
Would Relaxation of the Anti-doping Rule Lead to Red Queen Effects?Bengt Kayser & Andreas De Block - 2020 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 15 (3):1-15.
The Ethics of Doping and Anti-Doping: Redeeming the Soul of Sport?John Gleaves - 2011 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 5 (1):75-78.
Ideology, Doping and the Spirit of Sport.Vincent Geeraets - 2018 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 12 (3):255-271.
Intertemporal disagreement and empirical slippery slope arguments.Thomas Douglas - 2010 - Utilitas 22 (2):184-197.
The Spirit of Sport and the Medicalisation of Anti-Doping: Empirical and Normative Ethics.Michael J. McNamee - 2012 - Asian Bioethics Review 4 (4):374-392.
Faith and the Existence of God.R. G. Swinburne - 1988 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 24:121-143.
Doping and Anti-Doping Policy in Sport: Ethical, Legal, and Social Perspectives.Francisco Javier Lópex Frías - 2015 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 9 (1):86-91.
Genetics, bioethics and sport.Andy Miah - 2007 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1 (2):146 – 158.
Doping scandals, Rio, and the future of anti doping ethics. Or: what’s wrong with Savulescu’s recommendations for the regulation of pharmacological enhancement in sport.Mike McNamee - 2016 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 10 (2):113-116.
The Is - Ought Problem in Practical Ethics.Georg Spielthenner - 2017 - HEC Forum 29 (4):277-292.
Ethics Review in Anti-Doping Research: Experiences of Stakeholders.Thijs Devriendt, Virginia Sanchini & Pascal Borry - 2020 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 11 (2):125-133.
Are the current World Anti-Doping Agency guidelines morally justifiable? An overview of ethical considerations and possible alternatives.Roxanne Caron - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-15

Downloads
32 (#502,492)

6 months
17 (#151,744)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Coping with Doping.J. Corlett, Vincent Brown Jr & Kiersten Kirkland - 2013 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 40 (1):41-64.
Coping with Doping.J. Angelo Corlett, Vincent Brown & Kiersten Kirkland - 2013 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 40 (1):41-64.
Doping and Cheating.Jan Vorstenbosch - 2010 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 37 (2):166-181.
How to justify a ban on doping?Christof Breitsameter - 2017 - Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (5):287-292.

Add more references