No consent for brain death testing

Journal of Medical Ethics (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The overwhelming weight of legal authority in the USA and Canada holds that consent is not required for brain death testing. The situation in England and Wales is similar but different. While clinicians in England and Wales may have a prima facie duty to obtain consent, lack of consent has not barred testing. In three recent cases where consent for brain death testing was formally presented to the court, lack of consent was not determinative, and in one case the court questioned whether the clinicians were even required to seek consent from the parents of a child at all.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Brain Death Testing: Time for National Uniformity.Thaddeus Mason Pope - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (6):1-3.
Brain Death and the Law: Hard Cases and Legal Challenges.Thaddeus Pope - 2018 - Hastings Center Report 48 (S4):46-48.
Genetic Testing of Children: Who Should Consent?Lainie Friedman Ross - 2004 - In Justine Burley & John Harris (eds.), A Companion to Genethics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 114–126.
Informed consent for the diagnosis of brain death: a conceptual argument.Osamu Muramoto - 2016 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 11:8.
Declaring Death, Giving Life.David Cummiskey - 2005 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 15 (3):70-75.
Controversies in defining death: a case for choice.Robert M. Veatch - 2019 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 40 (5):381-401.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-12-30

Downloads
23 (#685,349)

6 months
23 (#120,782)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?