Consensus meetings will outperform integrative experiments

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 47:e56 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We expect that consensus meetings, where researchers come together to discuss their theoretical viewpoints, prioritize the factors they agree are important to study, standardize their measures, and determine a smallest effect size of interest, will prove to be a more efficient solution to the lack of coordination and integration of claims in science than integrative experiments.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,611

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Integrative design for thought-experiments.Daniel Dohrn & Angelica Mezzadri - 2024 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 47:e39.
Some problems with zooming out as scientific reform.Jessica Hullman - 2024 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 47:e49.
Intentional Side-Effects of Action.Jonathan Webber & Robin Scaife - 2013 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (2):179-203.
Disagreement, consensus, and moral integrity.Ruth Macklin - 1996 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (3):289-311.
Thought experiments without possible worlds.Daniel Dohrn - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (2):363-384.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-02-06

Downloads
7 (#1,394,148)

6 months
7 (#441,920)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniël Lakens
Eindhoven University of Technology

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references