- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The J. H. B. Bookshelf [Book Review]
Journal of the History of Biology 31 (1):143-154 (1998)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Paul Rabinow, Making PCR: A Story of Biotechnology. [REVIEW]Rachel Ankeny - 1997 - Philosophy in Review 17:67-69.
Paul Rabinow, Making PCR: A Story of Biotechnology Reviewed by. [REVIEW]Rachel Ankeny - 1997 - Philosophy in Review 17 (1):67-69.
book review: Rabinow, Paul: "Making PCR: A Story of Biotechnology" (Chicago 1996). [REVIEW]Richard Bilsker - 1998 - Hyle 4 (2):167 - 169.
The ethical and political evaluation of biotechnology strategies.Juha Räikkä - 2009 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 12 (3):273-280.
The zymotechnic roots of biotechnology.Anthony S. Travis, Willem J. Hornix & Robert Bud - 1992 - British Journal for the History of Science 25 (1):127-144.
Book Review: Paternity: a story of assisted conception, Double trouble: a story of assisted reproduction, Vacant possession: a story of proxy decision making. [REVIEW]M. Lorentzon - 2006 - Nursing Ethics 13 (5):565-565.
Phaedrus and Folklore: an Old Problem Restated.T. C. W. Stinton - 1979 - Classical Quarterly 29 (02):432-.
The three teachings of biotechnology.Mickey Gjerris - 2008 - In Kenneth H. David & Paul B. Thompson (eds.), What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?: Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience From the Debate Over Agrifood Biotechnology and Gmos. Elsevier/Academic Press.
The ideal of nature: debates about biotechnology and the environment.Gregory E. Kaebnick (ed.) - 2011 - Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
What can nanotechnology learn from biotechnology?Lawrence Busch & John R. Lloyd - 2008 - In Kenneth H. David & Paul B. Thompson (eds.), What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?: Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience From the Debate Over Agrifood Biotechnology and Gmos. Elsevier/Academic Press.
The ethics of agri-food biotechnology : how can an agricultural technology be so important?Jeffrey Burkhardt - 2008 - In Kenneth H. David & Paul B. Thompson (eds.), What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?: Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience From the Debate Over Agrifood Biotechnology and Gmos. Elsevier/Academic Press.
Biotechnology, nanotechnology, media, and public opinion.Susanna Priest - 2008 - In Kenneth H. David & Paul B. Thompson (eds.), What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?: Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience From the Debate Over Agrifood Biotechnology and Gmos. Elsevier/Academic Press.
A framework for translating biotechnology experiences to nanotechnology.David Sparling - 2008 - In Kenneth H. David & Paul B. Thompson (eds.), What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?: Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience From the Debate Over Agrifood Biotechnology and Gmos. Elsevier/Academic Press.
How Not to Interpret the Advances of Biotechnology.Giridhari L. Pandit - 2005 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 12 (1):93-102.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-02-04
Downloads
18 (#837,580)
6 months
1 (#1,478,551)
2015-02-04
Downloads
18 (#837,580)
6 months
1 (#1,478,551)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Complexity begets crosscutting, dooms hierarchy.Joyce C. Havstad - 2021 - Synthese 198 (8):7665-7696.
Antibiotic Resistance and the Biology of History.Hannah Landecker - 2016 - Body and Society 22 (4):19-52.
The Bermuda Triangle: The Pragmatics, Policies, and Principles for Data Sharing in the History of the Human Genome Project.Kathryn Maxson Jones, Rachel A. Ankeny & Robert Cook-Deegan - 2018 - Journal of the History of Biology 51 (4):693-805.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-dmxst uwo