Negation in Relevant Logics (How I Stopped Worrying and Learned to Love the Routley star)

In Dov Gabbay & Heinrich Wansing (eds.), What is Negation? Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 53-76 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The non-involutive Routley star: relevant logics without weak double negation.Gemma Robles - 2010 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 29 (3):103-116.
A star-free semantics for R.Edwin D. Mares - 1995 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (2):579 - 590.
Simplified semantics for relevant logics (and some of their rivals).Greg Restall - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 22 (5):481 - 511.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
82 (#205,812)

6 months
12 (#220,085)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Greg Restall
University of Melbourne

Citations of this work

Logical Pluralism.Jc Beall & Greg Restall - 2005 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Edited by Greg Restall.
Logical pluralism.Jc Beall & Greg Restall - 2000 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (4):475 – 493.
Impossible Worlds.Franz Berto & Mark Jago - 2013 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Truthmaker Semantics for Relevant Logic.Mark Jago - 2020 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 49 (4):681-702.
A Modality Called ‘Negation’.Francesco Berto - 2015 - Mind 124 (495):761-793.

View all 55 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references