Truth Values and Proof Theory

Studia Logica 92 (2):241-264 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I present an account of truth values for classical logic, intuitionistic logic, and the modal logic S5, in which truth values are not a fundamental category from which the logic is defined, but rather, an idealisation of more fundamental logical features in the proof theory for each system. The result is not a new set of semantic structures, but a new understanding of how the existing semantic structures may be understood in terms of a more fundamental notion of logical consequence.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reinflating Logical Consequence.Owen Griffiths - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic (1):1-9.
From the "naturalistic fallacy" to the ideal observer theory.Glen-O. Allen - 1970 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 30:533-549.
Valor de verdad.John Corcoran - 2011 - In Luis Vega and Paula Olmos (ed.), Compendio de Lógica, Argumentación y Retórica. Editorial Trotta. pp. 627--629.
Modal models for bradwardine's theory of truth.Greg Restall - 2008 - Review of Symbolic Logic 1 (2):225-240.
Towards a Theory of Partial Truth.Jean-Pierre Marquis - 1988 - Dissertation, Mcgill University (Canada)
Proof theory and set theory.Gaisi Takeuti - 1985 - Synthese 62 (2):255 - 263.
On the probabilistic convention T.Hannes Leitgeb - 2008 - Review of Symbolic Logic 1 (2):218-224.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-07-11

Downloads
130 (#141,523)

6 months
17 (#151,744)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Greg Restall
University of Melbourne

Citations of this work

Paradoxes and Failures of Cut.David Ripley - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (1):139 - 164.
Negation on the Australian Plan.Francesco Berto & Greg Restall - 2019 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 48 (6):1119-1144.
Anything Goes.David Ripley - 2015 - Topoi 34 (1):25-36.
Speech Acts, Categoricity, and the Meanings of Logical Connectives.Ole Thomassen Hjortland - 2014 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 55 (4):445-467.
Pluralism and Proofs.Greg Restall - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (S2):279-291.

View all 21 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Elements of Intuitionism.Michael Dummett - 1977 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Roberto Minio.
The logic of paradox.Graham Priest - 1979 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):219 - 241.
Intuitionism.Arend Heyting - 1956 - Amsterdam,: North-Holland Pub. Co..
Multiple Conclusions.Greg Restall - 2005 - In Petr Hájek, Luis Valdés-Villanueva & Dag Westerståhl (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. College Publications.
Inferentialism and Some of Its Challenges.Robert Brandom - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (3):651-676.

View all 11 references / Add more references