Cantor's Illusion

Abstract

This analysis shows Cantor's diagonal definition in his 1891 paper was not compatible with his horizontal enumeration of the infinite set M. The diagonal sequence was a counterfeit which he used to produce an apparent exclusion of a single sequence to prove the cardinality of M is greater than the cardinality of the set of integers N.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Constructing Cantorian counterexamples.George Boolos - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (3):237-239.
On infinite size.Bruno Whittle - 2015 - Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 9:3-19.
Taming the infinite.A. W. Moore - 1997 - Foundations of Science 2 (1):53-56.
Whittle’s assault on Cantor’s paradise.Vann McGee - 2015 - Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 9.
Cantorův diagonální důkaz.Marta Vlasáková - 2023 - Teorie Vědy / Theory of Science 1 (1).
The Mathematics of the Infinite.John-Michael Kuczynski - 2015 - Amazon Digital Services LLC.
What is the infinite?Øystein Linnebo - 2013 - The Philosophers' Magazine 61:42-47.
Wittgenstein on Cantor's Proof.Chrysoula Gitsoulis - 2019 - In Gabriele Mras, Paul Weingartner & Bernhard Ritter (eds.), Philosophy of Logic and Mathematics, Contributions to the 41st International Wittgenstein Symposium. Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society. pp. 67-69.
Cantor, God, and Inconsistent Multiplicities.Aaron R. Thomas-Bolduc - 2016 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 44 (1):133-146.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-14

Downloads
84 (#201,564)

6 months
84 (#57,572)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references