The paradox of analysis: A solution

&
Metaphilosophy 12 (1):1-6 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2007

DOI

10.1111/j.1467-9973.1981.tb00110.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A dichotomic analysis of the surprise examination paradox.Paul Franceschi - 2002
Some problems with Chisholm and Potter's solution to the paradox of analysis.Neil Thomason - 1992 - Metaphilosophy 23 (1-2):132-138.
The paradoxes of analysis and synonymy.S. D. Rieber - 1994 - Erkenntnis 41 (1):103 - 116.
The liar paradox in new clothes.Jeff Snapper - 2012 - Analysis 72 (2):319-322.
The new paradox of the stone revisited.Erik J. Wielenberg - 2001 - Faith and Philosophy 18 (2):261-268.
Probabilistic causality and Simpson's paradox.Richard Otte - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (1):110-125.
A paradox of definability: Richard's and poincaré's ways out.Keith Simmons - 1994 - History and Philosophy of Logic 15 (1):33-44.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
164 (#118,096)

6 months
16 (#160,768)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology.Herman Cappelen, Tamar Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.) - 2016 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
What is a philosophical analysis?Jeffrey C. King - 1998 - Philosophical Studies 90 (2):155-179.
Analyzing analysis.C. Anthony Anderson - 1993 - Philosophical Studies 72 (2-3):199 - 222.
A semantic resolution of the paradox of analysis.Dennis Earl - 2007 - Acta Analytica 22 (3):189-205.
Frege’s Ancestral and Its Circularities.Ignacio Angelelli - 2012 - Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):477-483.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references