- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The conception of an aesthetic object according to Roman Ingarden and Clarence Irvin Lewis in the light of the Bohdan dziemidok’s critique of phenomenological aesthetics
Sztuka I Filozofia (Art and Philosophy) 55 (2) (2019)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Roman Ingarden's Theory of Value of the Work of Art in the light of Marxist Aesthetics.Bohdan Dziemidok & Edmund Gussman - 1975 - Dialectics and Humanism 2 (2):123-132.
Bohdan Dziemidok and Peter McCormick, eds., On the Aesthetics of Roman Ingarden: Interpretations and Assessments Reviewed by.Laurent Stern - 1990 - Philosophy in Review 10 (6):225-228.
Possibility of the Aesthetic Experience. [REVIEW]Douglas R. Anderson - 1992 - Idealistic Studies 22 (3):219-220.
Reconsidering Ingarden’s Contribution to European Aesthetics: Aesthetic Experience and the Concept of Encounter.Małgorzata Anna Szyszkowska - 2018 - Espes 7 (1):47-56.
Controversy about the aesthetic nature of art.Bohdan Dziemidok - 1988 - British Journal of Aesthetics 28 (1):1-17.
Aesthetic Experience and Evaluation.Bohdan Dziemidok - 1983 - In Monroe C. Beardsley & John Fisher (eds.), Essays on aesthetics: perspectives on the work of Monroe C. Beardsley. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. pp. 53--68.
Ingardeniana Ii New Studies in the Philosophy of Roman Ingarden, with a New International Ingarden Bibliography.Hans H. Rudnick - 1990
Kunst und Ontologie: Für Roman Ingarden zum 100. Geburtstag.Wlodzimierz Galewicz, Elisabth Ströker & Wladyslaw Strozewski (eds.) - 1994 - BRILL.
Kunst Und Ontologie: Für Roman Ingarden Zum 100. Geburtstag.Włodzimierz Galewicz, Elisabeth Ströker & Władysław Strozewski (eds.) - 1994 - Brill | Rodopi.
Aesthetic experience and aesthetic object.Roman Ingarden - 1960 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 21 (3):289-313.
Roman Ingarden and the aesthetic object.Gary Iseminger - 1973 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 33 (3):417-420.
The Poetics of Roman Ingarden.G. David Pollick - 1982 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 40 (3):345-347.
Pojęcie idealnej granicy w estetyce dzieła muzycznego Romana Ingardena.Małgorzata A. Szyszkowska - 2011 - Aspekty Muzyki 1:203-225.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-12-18
Downloads
15 (#952,044)
6 months
6 (#530,055)
2019-12-18
Downloads
15 (#952,044)
6 months
6 (#530,055)
Historical graph of downloads
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-ldh8k uwo