Affording Affordance Moral Realism

Biological Theory 16 (1):30-48 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article I elaborate a scientifically based moral realism that I call affordance moral realism, and I offer a promissory note that affordance moral realism is the best current explanation of morality. Affordance moral realism maintains that morality is constituted by the interaction of moral agents and moral affordances. The latter are the natural and social environments in which moral agents’ activities take place and contain the objects of moral agents’ activities whose actualizations are the manifestation of substantive moral goods. In making this argument, I take a scientific naturalistic approach that includes both the natural and social sciences, aiming to make my account both methodologically and substantively naturalistic. On the subject side of my affordance view, I offer a scientific account of moral agency, one based on an extension of social cognitive theories of agency to the realm of morality. And I argue that affordance moral realism explains the nature of moral agency, its acquisition, maintenance, and successful performance. To explain its origin and maintenance, I make use of a general theory of selection that embraces biological, social, cultural, and intentional selection. On the object side, I offer a theory of moral affordances and their actualizations, employing the findings and theories of moral developmental psychology and moral psychology to understand their actualizations through the successful operations of moral agents. I conclude that a scientifically based naturalistic affordance moral realism promises to provide the best current account of morality. It is not only affordable; it’s a bargain.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Husserlian Horizons, Cognitive Affordances and Motivating Reasons for Action.Marta Jorba - 2020 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences (5):1-22.
The concept of a structural affordance.Adrian Alsmith - 2012 - Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies 3 (2):94-107.
Metasemantics, Moral Realism and Moral Doctrines.Christine Tiefensee - 2022 - In Visa A. J. Kurki & Mark Mcbride (eds.), Without Trimmings: The Legal, Moral, and Political Philosophy of Matthew Kramer. Oxford, Vereinigtes Königreich: Oxford University Press. pp. 189-204.
Moral Realism: Discovering Right and Wrong.Alice Perrin - 1988 - Dissertation, University of Miami
Gastronomic Realism - A Cautionary Tale.Don Loeb - 2003 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 23 (1):30-49.
On the Alleged Laziness of Moral Realists.Daniel Weltman - 2020 - Journal of Value Inquiry 54 (3):511-518.
Moral Realism and the Incompletability of Morality.Melis Erdur - 2018 - Journal of Value Inquiry 52 (2):227-237.
Is there a Good Moral Argument against Moral Realism?Camil Golub - 2020 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 24 (1):151-164.
Realism and Moral Epistemology.Geoffrey Donald Sayre-Mccord - 1986 - Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh
Moral realism and teleosemantics.Richard Joyce - 2001 - Biology and Philosophy 16 (5):723-31.
Morality, Meaning and Realism.Douglas Joel Butler - 1988 - Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-10-22

Downloads
45 (#354,779)

6 months
13 (#198,663)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William A. Rottschaefer
Boston University (PhD)

Citations of this work

Moral affordances and the demands of fittingness.Fabienne Peter - forthcoming - Philosophical Psychology.

Add more citations