Method vs. Metaphysics

Church History and Religious Culture 100 (2-3) (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article discusses Descartes’s preferred focus on morally and theologically neutral subjects and points out the impact of this focus on the scientific status of theology. It does so by linking Descartes’s method to his transformation of the notion of substance. Descartes’s _Meditations_ centred around epistemological questions rather than non-human intelligences or the life of the mind beyond this world. Likewise, in his early works, Descartes consistently avoided referring to causal operators. Finally, having first redefined the notion of substance in the _Principia,_ Descartes would completely abandon making use of this notion in his later years. Indeed, in contrast to many authors before and after him, Descartes never showed any interest in the long-established metaphysical interpretation of substances as being causal factors of natural change. With God, nature, and mind commonly serving as instances of substantial causality, Descartes’s philosophy had a huge impact on the place of God in science and discreetl.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Descartes’s Turn to the Body.Razvan Ioan - 2020 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 24 (2):369-388.
Descartes’s changing mind.Peter Machamer & J. E. McGuire - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (3):398-419.
Cartesian Questions: Method and Metaphysics. [REVIEW]Brandon Look - 2000 - Review of Metaphysics 54 (1):160-161.
THE SUBSTANCE-ATTRIBUTES RELATIONSHIP IN CARTESIAN DUALISM.Françoise Monnoyeur - 2018 - Journal of Philosophical Research 43:177-189.
Descartes on mind-body interaction.Daniel Holbrook - 1992 - Southwest Philosophical Studies 14:74-83.
Descartes and Method: A Search for a Method in Meditations.Clarence A. Bonnen & Daniel E. Flage - 1999 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Clarence A. Bonnen.
Descartes and Method in 1637.Daniel Garber - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:225-236.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-03-20

Downloads
8 (#1,323,248)

6 months
2 (#1,206,195)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references