Measuring morality in videogames research

Ethics and Information Technology 22 (1):55-68 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There has been a recent surge of research interest in videogames of moral engagement for entertainment, advocacy and education. We have seen a wealth of analysis and several theoretical models proposed, but experimental evaluation has been scarce. One of the difficulties lies in the measurement of moral engagement. How do we meaningfully measure whether players are engaging with and affected by the moral choices in the games they play? In this paper, we survey the various standard psychometric instruments from the moral psychology literature and discuss how they might be applied in the evaluation of games.

Similar books and articles

The art of videogames.Grant Tavinor - 2009 - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Videogames and aesthetics.Grant Tavinor - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (8):624-634.
The Aesthetics of Videogames.Jon Robson & Grant Tavinor (eds.) - 2018 - New York: Routledge.
Videogames and the Moving Image.Aaron Meskin & Jon Robson - 2010 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4:547-564.
Focus, Sensitivity, Judgement, Action: Four Lenses for Designing Morally Engaging Games.Malcolm Ryan, Dan Staines & Paul Formosa - 2017 - Transactions of the Digital Games Research Association 2 (3):143-173.
Games and the moral transformation of violence.C. Thi Nguyen - 2018 - In Jon Robson & Grant Tavinor (eds.), The Aesthetics of Videogames. Routledge. pp. 181-197.
Liberal Morality and Socialist Morality.W. B. Gallie - 1949 - Philosophy 24 (91):318 - 334.
Fact, Fiction and Virtual Worlds.Alexandre Declos - 2020 - In R. Pouivet & V. Granata (eds.), Epistemology of Aesthetics. Rennes, France: Presses Universitaires de Rennes. pp. 195-219.
Virtual domains for sports and games.Jason Holt - 2016 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 10 (1):5-13.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-10-11

Downloads
1,189 (#10,507)

6 months
285 (#7,847)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Formosa
Macquarie University

References found in this work

The Tacit Dimension. --.Michael Polanyi & Amartya Sen - 1966 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition Advancing the Debate.Jonathan Evans & Keith E. Stanovich - 2013 - Perspectives on Psychological Science 8 (3):223-241.
The measurement of moral judgment.Anne Colby - 1987 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Lawrence Kohlberg.
Mapping the moral domain.Jesse Graham, Brian A. Nosek, Jonathan Haidt, Ravi Iyer, Spassena Koleva & Peter H. Ditto - 2011 - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 101 (2):366-385.

View all 23 references / Add more references