France Veber's Theory of Value

Grazer Philosophische Studien 31 (1):45-57 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Veber's theory of value is based on his general classification of mental phenomena. Value-experiences constitute a special variety of emotional experiences: they have a pseudo-cognitive role; that is, they "perceive" values just as ordinary presentations perceive things and their properties. Veber also makes several distinctions between different types of value-perceiving emotions. Finally he discusses the kinds of objective correlates that these experiences have and thereby distinguishes between three types of value: thing-value, person-value and hagiological value. He may be criticised for inconsistency, because he starts f r om the descriptive standpoint but ends up by legislating on how we ought to value persons.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hitting Reality.Seppo Sajama - 1995 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 50 (1):559-572.
Veber on knowledge and factuality.Bojan žalec - 2004 - Acta Analytica 19 (33):241-263.
Sensation According to Meinong and Veber.Matjaž Potrč - 1995 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 50 (1):573-590.
Logik und kalkül. Zur kritik France vebers an der mathematischen logik.Andrej Ule - 2002 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 64 (1):119-135.
The Argument from Abomination.Michael Veber - 2013 - Erkenntnis 78 (5):1185-1196.
How to fake Munchausen's syndrome.Michael Veber - 2010 - Philosophical Psychology 23 (5):565-574.
The Epistemology of Belief – Hamid Vahid.Michael Veber - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (241):871-873.
The Qualitative Character of Spatial Perception.Douglas B. Meehan - 2007 - Dissertation, Graduate Center, City University of New York
What do you do with misleading evidence?By Michael Veber - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (217):557–569.
The myth of religious experience.Nick Zangwill - 2004 - Religious Studies 40 (1):1-22.
What is wrong with the DSM?Rachel Cooper - 2004 - History of Psychiatry 15 (1):5-25.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-04

Downloads
27 (#592,811)

6 months
13 (#200,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references