Doing things twice: Strategies to identify studies for targeted validation

Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1703.01601 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The “reproducibility crisis” has been a highly visible source of scientific controversy and dispute. Here, I propose and review several avenues for identifying and prioritizing research studies for the purpose of targeted validation. Of the various proposals discussed, I identify scientific data science as being a strategy that merits greater attention among those interested in reproducibility. I argue that the tremendous potential of scientific data science for uncovering high-value research studies is a significant and rarely discussed benefit of the transition to a fully open-access publishing model.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Revival of Objectivity in Scientific Method.Doug Fraedrich - 2001 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 3 (1):29-46.
Genomic research data: open vs. restricted access.David B. Resnik - 2010 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 32 (1):1.
Understanding scientific study via process modeling.Robert W. P. Luk - 2010 - Foundations of Science 15 (1):49-78.
The ‘Big Picture’: The Problem of Extrapolation in Basic Research.Tudor M. Baetu - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (4):941-964.
Clinical specificity and the non-generalities of science.Ant Lettinga & Annemaire Mol - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (6):517-535.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-07-01

Downloads
13 (#1,041,239)

6 months
2 (#1,206,802)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references