My language disquotes

Analysis 59 (3):206–211 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is a defence of Putnam's claim that the proposition expressed by the sentence 'I am a brain-in-a-vat' is necessarily false. In particular, the paper defends the anti-sceptical conclusion against an attack by Noonan.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,471

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
127 (#144,711)

6 months
9 (#320,673)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sarah Sawyer
University of Sussex

Citations of this work

Semantic Pragmatism and A Priori Knowledge.Henry Jackman - 2001 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 31 (4):455-480.
Reply to Sawyer on brains in vats.H. W. Noonan - 2000 - Analysis 60 (3):247-249.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reason, truth, and history.Hilary Putnam - 1981 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Reason, Truth and History.Kathleen Okruhlik - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (4):692-694.
IV*β€”On Putnam's Proof that We are not Brains-in-a-Vat1.Crispin Wright - 1992 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 92 (1):67-94.

Add more references