Would the Convergence of Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science Be a Springboard for Transhumanism and Posthumanism?

Open Journal of Philosophy 13 (4):681-695 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Nanotechnologies, biotechnologies, information technologies and cognitive sciences (NBIC) have gradually gained traction in the United States of America (USA), subsequently expanding to Europe, and are now proliferating worldwide. Scientists are trying with more success to remove the causes of death by “repairing” humans, or even by “increasing” their physical and cognitive capacities. NBICs not only can help researchers promote “one health” by improving environmental conditions, human and animal health, but also, they can lead humanity towards transhumanism through eugenics. Thanks to the principle of totality, the intentional modification of the human body for therapeutic purposes through surgery has always been seen as a source of medical progress. But how far can the living human body be modified at will? Gilbert Hottois and Jean-François Mattei have deciphered transhumanism to question its alleged “humanism” and study its impact on our humanity. Today, science has gone further thanks to the possibilities offered by converging NBIC technologies and especially with the advent of human genome editing! The objective of this article is to highlight the hopes and fears of Homo sapiens following the applications of NBICs, and to propose ethical reflections on the invading transhumanist and posthumanist doctrines that tend to become spiritual movements, even religions. A summary study, based on a scientific bibliography, linked to NBICs and including ethical aspects, will present the ethical issues of the convergence of nanotechnologies, biotechnologies, information technologies and cognitive sciences, which could become a springboard for transhumanism and posthumanism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

“Nanoselves”: NBIC and the Culture of Convergence.Priya Venkatesan - 2010 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 30 (2):119-129.
Homo biotechnologicus.Emil Višňovský - 2015 - Human Affairs 25 (2):230-237.
Transhumanism – Philosophical Foundations.Lovro Furjanić - 2020 - Filozofska Istrazivanja 40 (2):233-249.
Converging technologies and human destiny.William Sims Bainbridge - 2007 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (3):197 – 216.
From Biotechnology to Nanotechnology: What Can We Learn from Earlier Technologies?Michael D. Mehta - 2004 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 24 (1):34-39.
Governance Challenges of Technological Systems Convergence.Jim Whitman - 2006 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 26 (5):398-409.
Steps to Designing AI-Empowered Nanotechnology: A Value Sensitive Design Approach.Steven Umbrello - 2019 - Delphi - Interdisciplinary Review of Emerging Technologies 2 (2):79-83.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-10-26

Downloads
13 (#1,041,239)

6 months
9 (#317,143)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Towards a feminist global ethics.Rosemarie Tong - 2022 - Global Bioethics 33 (1):14-31.
Enhancing Who? Enhancing What? Ethics, Bioethics, and Transhumanism.T. Koch - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (6):685-699.
Introduction.Cristina Richie - 2022 - Global Bioethics 33 (1):1-3.

View all 10 references / Add more references