Replies to critics

Asian Journal of Philosophy 3 (1) (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In these replies, I react to comments on my paper “Facts about Incoherence as Non-Evidential Epistemic Reasons”, provided by Aleks Knoks, Sebastian Schmidt, Keshav Singh, and Conor McHugh. I discuss potential counterexamples to my claim that the fact that the subject’s doxastic attitudes are incoherent is an epistemic reason for her to suspend; whether such incoherence-based reasons bear on individual attitudes or only on combinations of attitudes; the prospects of restricting evidentialism about epistemic reasons to reasons to believe; whether incoherence-based reasons are truly epistemic; the alleged normative and motivational expendability of incoherence-based reasons; the possibility of incoherence-based reasons to suspend without actual belief in the incoherent propositions; the relationship between suspension, inquiry, and incoherence; and the nature of suspension of judgment.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Evidence and facts about incoherence: Reply to Schmidt.Aleks Knoks - 2023 - Asian Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):1-11.
Replies to critics.Jamin Asay - 2022 - Asian Journal of Philosophy 1 (1):1-15.
Replies to critics.David Estlund - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 178 (7):2439-2472.
Replies to my critics.Robert Sinclair - 2023 - Asian Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):1-13.
Replies to My Critics.Bernard Reginster - 2012 - Journal of Nietzsche Studies 43 (1):130-143.
Replies to Gäb, Schmidt and Scott.Tim Crane - 2023 - Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 65 (4):458-463.
Replies.Kit Fine - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 122 (3):367 - 395.
Replies to critics.Declan Smithies - 2022 - Asian Journal of Philosophy 1 (1):1-15.
Replies to Critics.Fabrice Correia & Sven Rosenkranz - 2021 - Disputatio 13 (63):445-494.
Replies to critics.Miranda Fricker - 2008 - Theoria 23 (1):81-86.
Replies to my Critics.Jose L. Zalabardo - 2014 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 33 (3):181-202.
Replies to the critics.Edward N. Zalta - 1993 - Philosophical Studies 69 (2-3):231-242.
Incoherence and the balance of evidential reasons.Sebastian Schmidt - 2023 - Asian Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):1-10.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-04-17

Downloads
5 (#1,544,856)

6 months
5 (#648,432)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eva Schmidt
TU Dortmund

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Incoherence and the balance of evidential reasons.Sebastian Schmidt - 2023 - Asian Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):1-10.

Add more references