A tale of two studies: Ethics, bioterrorism, and the censorship of science

Hastings Center Report 37 (3):35-43 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

: Some scientific research should not be published. The risks to national security and public health override the social benefits of disseminating scientific results openly. Unfortunately, scientists themselves are not in a position to know which studies to withhold from public view, as the National Research Council has proposed. Yet neither can government alone be trusted to balance the competing interests at stake

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
83 (#203,483)

6 months
14 (#182,887)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Smallpox revisited?Michael J. Selgelid - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (1):5 – 11.
Classified.[author unknown] - 1977 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 50 (3):240-241.
Classified.[author unknown] - 1977 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 50 (5):436-436.

Add more references