THE INTACT SYSTEMS ARGUMENT: Problems with the Standard Defense of Animal Experimentation

Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (3):323-333 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
31 (#520,333)

6 months
4 (#799,256)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The role of convention in the communication of private events.Chris Moore - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4):656-657.
Animal experimentation: The legacy of Claude Bernard.Hugh LaFollette & Niall Shanks - 1994 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 8 (3):195 – 210.
The Origin of Speciesism.Hugh Lafollette & Niall Shanks - 1996 - Philosophy 71 (275):41-.
Util-izing animals.Hugh Lafollette & Niall Shanks - 1995 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):13-25.

View all 33 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan & Mary Midgley - 1986 - The Personalist Forum 2 (1):67-71.
Animal Liberation.Bill Puka & Peter Singer - 1977 - Philosophical Review 86 (4):557.
The Selfish Gene. [REVIEW]Gunther S. Stent & Richard Dawkins - 1977 - Hastings Center Report 7 (6):33.

Add more references