Minimal Risk Remains an Open Question

, &
American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):25 - 27 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 11, Issue 6, Page 25-27, June 2011

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161.2011.568579

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Dangers of Using a Relative Risk Standard for Minimal Risk.Seema Shah - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):22 - 23.
The Concept of Minimal Risk: The Need for Better Guidance on the Ethics Review Process.Kyoko Wada - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):27 - 29.
A Relative Standard for Minimal Risk is Unnecessary and Potentially Harmful to Children: Lessons from the Phambili Trial.Robert M. Nelson - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):14 - 16.
Minimal risk revisited: the ethics of clinical research with children.Ariella Binik - unknown
Minimal Risk in Research Involving Pregnant Women and Fetuses.Carson Strong - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (3):529-538.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Relative Versus Absolute Standards for Everyday Risk in Adolescent HIV Prevention Trials: Expanding the Debate”.Jeremy Snyder, Cari L. Miller & Glenda Gray - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):W1 - W3.
Why Even Inappropriate Parental Consent Might Be Enough to Justify Minimal Risk Pediatric Research Without Clinical Benefit.David Hunter - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (1):35 - 36.
Risk in Emergency Research Using a Waiver of/Exception from Consent: Implications of a Structured Approach for Institutional Review Board Review.Andrew D. McRae, Stacy Ackroyd-Stolarz & Charles Weijer - unknown
When "Minimal Risk" Research Yields Clinically-Significant Data, Maybe the Risks Aren't So Minimal.Helen M. Sharp & Robert D. Orr - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (2):32-36.
Minimal Risk and Its Implications.Charles Weijer - unknown
Relative Versus Absolute Standards for Everyday Risk in Adolescent HIV Prevention Trials: Expanding the Debate.Jeremy Snyder, Cari L. Miller & Glenda Gray - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):5 - 13.
Uniqueness, Exploitation, and Relative Risk Standards in Adolescent Research.Janet Malek - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):23 - 25.
Why We Don't Need a Relative Risk Standard for Adolescent HIV Vaccine Trials in South Africa.Catherine M. Slack - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):21 - 22.
Definable Open Sets As Finite Unions of Definable Open Cells.Simon Andrews - 2010 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51 (2):247-251.
Regulating “Higher Risk, No Direct Benefit” Studies in Minors.Anna E. Westra, Jan M. Wit, Rám N. Sukhai & Inez D. de Beaufort - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):29 - 31.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-06-15

Downloads
28 (#574,430)

6 months
5 (#649,144)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Ariella Binik
McMaster University
Charles Weijer
University of Western Ontario

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Exploitation.Alan Wertheimer - 1996 - Princeton University Press.
Exploitation.Michael Gorr - 1998 - Philosophical Review 107 (2):296.
Defining and Describing Benefit Appropriately in Clinical Trials.Nancy M. P. King - 2000 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (4):332-343.

View all 9 references / Add more references