New concepts can be learned: Susan Carey, The Origin of Concepts, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2009 [Book Review]

Biology and Philosophy 26 (1):129 - 139 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many have doubted whether the transition to genuinely new representational resources is susceptible to psychological explanation. In The Origin of Concepts (O.U.P. 2009), Susan Carey makes a strong empirical case for the existence of discontinuities in conceptual development. Carey also offers a plausible psychological explanation of some of these transitions, in particular of the child’s acquisition of the ability to represent natural numbers. The combination amounts to a forceful answer to puzzles about the learnability of new representations.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Editorial: David Hull 1935–2010.Kim Sterelny - 2010 - Biology and Philosophy 25 (5):737-737.
David Hull.Peter Godfrey-Smith - 2010 - Biology and Philosophy 25 (5):749-753.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-11-21

Downloads
190 (#105,651)

6 months
7 (#441,834)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nicholas Shea
School of Advanced Study, University of London

Citations of this work

Representation in Cognitive Science.Nicholas Shea - 2018 - Oxford University Press.
Skilled Action and the Double Life of Intention.Joshua Shepherd - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 98 (2):286-305.
Can Bootstrapping Explain Concept Learning?Jacob Beck - 2017 - Cognition 158 (C):110–121.
On representational content and format in core numerical cognition.Brian Ball - 2017 - Philosophical Psychology 30 (1-2):119-139.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations