A criança com restrição verbal e o conceito de intercompreensão e multimodalidade na clínica da linguagem: um estudo de caso

Bakhtiniana 19 (2):e62685p (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article aims to analyze the process of mutual understanding from the perspective of Discursive Neurolinguistics. As a methodology, a case study was carried out on a child with a linguistic profile of verbal restriction, which concerns the dimension of utterances involving words and their morphology. Data interpretation was based on the Bakhtinian perspective, which addresses ‘understanding’ as an active-responsive process and meaning as emerging from the relationship between utterances. The results showed that the interlocutors’ common ground allowed the joint construction of meaning even in the face of verbal restrictions, and aspects such as nonverbal elements and the recognition of the child’s active-responsive role also favored mutual understanding. As a conclusion, the attention to different multimodal resources as legitimate modes of expression allows children with verbal restrictions to fulfill the role of “speakers” regardless of their modes of expression.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Non-verbal Communication and Language.Michael Argyle - 1976 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 10:63-78.
Non-verbal Communication and Language.Michael Argyle - 1976 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 10:63-78.
The Method of Verbal Dispute.Alan Sidelle - 2007 - Philosophical Topics 35 (1-2):83-113.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-19

Downloads
11 (#1,141,291)

6 months
11 (#242,683)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

So you think gestures are nonverbal?David McNeill - 1985 - Psychological Review 92 (3):350-371.

Add more references