Cosmology and Psychology in Stoicism: The Unifying Role of Mind in the Stoic System

Dissertation, Durham University (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Stoics commit to a view of the universe as a unified living being endowed with a mind. But what is the explanatory value of this cosmological model? Generally speaking, most scholars believe Stoic cosmic psychology to work either as a metaphor for the unification produced by natural processes, or to be a consequence of the fact that mind is a primitive component of the Stoic system, given that one of the Stoic first principles is usually considered to be endowed with intelligence. In this thesis, I will argue against both views by claiming that the Stoics developed a highly sophisticated cosmic psychology in order to articulate an original theory of the unity of the cosmos. In doing so, I will first show how the Stoics introduce a new use of the notion of sympathy or co-affection (συμπάθεια) in order to produce an emergentist account of cosmic mental faculties. Then, I will then examine the unifying functions performed by the two main faculties of the cosmic mind: perception (αἴσθησις), which unifies the cosmos by endowing it with the ability of representing itself as a subject, and therefore, as an agent; and will (βούλησις), which unifies the cosmos by granting its activity a unified teleological orientation. I will thus make a strong claim regarding the relation between mental faculties and corporealism in the Stoics, showing how they are neither a metaphor for natural processes, but instead develop naturally from the principles on which Stoic philosophy is based, with the aim of articulating and unifying the complexity of the cosmos into a coherent whole.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A New Stoicism. [REVIEW]Thomas Carson - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (3):737-740.
Reservation in Stoic Ethics.Tad Brennan - 2000 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 82 (2):149-177.
Eudorus' psychology and Stoic ethics.Mauro Bonazzi - 2007 - In Mauro Bonazzi & Christoph Helmig (eds.), Platonic Stoicism, stoic Platonism: the dialogue between Platonism and Stoicism in antiquity. Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press.
Quanta sub nocte iaceret nostra dies (Lucan, BC 9,13f.): Stoizismen als Mittel der Verfremdung bei Lucan.Jula Wildberger - 2005 (Rpt. 2011) - In Christine Walde (ed.), Lucan in the 21st Century. Berlin; Boston: Brill (originally Saur). pp. 56-88.
Stoicism Today.Jean-Baptiste Gourinat - 2009 - Iris. European Journal of Philosophy and Public Debate 1 (2):497-511.
Stoic Minimalism: ‘Just Enough Stoicism’ for Modern Practitioners.Chuck Chakrapani - 2022 - Symposion: Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences 9 (1):11-29.
The art of retrieval: Stoicism?C. Kavin Rowe - 2012 - Journal of Religious Ethics 40 (4):706-719.
Early Stoic Determinism.Susanne Bobzien - 2005 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 4 (4):489-516.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-02-06

Downloads
7 (#1,392,801)

6 months
4 (#798,550)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references