Parfit's Case Against Subjectivism

In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 6: Volume 6. Oxford University Press (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that Parfit's On What Matters does not make a compelling case against subjective accounts of reasons for action.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,611

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Parfit on what matters in survival.Anthony Brueckner - 1993 - Philosophical Studies 70 (1):1-22.
Parfit’s Challenges.Marko Jurjako - 2011 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 11 (2):237-248.
Naturalism without tears.James Lenman - 2009 - Ratio 22 (1):1-18.
Pain for objectivists: The case of matters of mere taste.David Sobel - 2005 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (4):437 - 457.
The Reasons that Matter.Stephen Finlay - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (1):1 – 20.
Go Tell It on the Mountain.Bart Schultz - 2014 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 44 (2):233-251.
On What Matters: Two-Volume Set.Derek Parfit - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-08-17

Downloads
97 (#179,971)

6 months
1 (#1,478,830)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Sobel
Syracuse University

Citations of this work

How to Unify Theories of Sensory Pleasure: An Adverbialist Proposal.Murat Aydede - 2014 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 5 (1):119-133.
Desire-Based Theories of Reasons, Pleasure and Welfare.Chris Heathwood - 2011 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 6:79-106.
The Case Against Meat.Ben Bramble - 2015 - In Ben Bramble Bob Fischer (ed.), The Moral Complexities of Eating Meat. Oxford University Press.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references