Perceptions of Ethicality: The Role of Attire Style, Attire Appropriateness, and Context

Journal of Business Ethics 189 (1):149-175 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Professional attire has traditionally been regarded as a sign of ethicality. However, recent trends towards a more casual workplace may have altered the general public’s attire-based perceptions. To determine whether these trends have rendered the association between professional attire and ethicality obsolete, we draw on signaling theory and we examine, in two laboratory studies with working samples, the main effects of attire style (i.e., business formal, business casual, casual) on perceptions of employee ethicality. We also assess the mediating effects of attire appropriateness, the moderating effects of context (industry type), as well as their combined moderated-mediation effects in the relation between attire style and the outcome of interest. We find that casual attire is perceived as less ethical than business casual attire in both studies but is perceived as less ethical than business formal attire in the first study only. Moreover, the effect of attire style on perceptions of ethicality is mediated by perceptions of attire appropriateness. Lastly, we found inconclusive results for the moderated-mediation model, which suggest a more intricate effect of industry type than originally proposed. Three subsequent focus groups with working professionals provided additional insights into our findings and revealed workplace-relevant outcomes associated with perceptions of ethicality. Theoretical and practical implications, study limitations, and future research avenues are discussed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

V Chemnitz East Forum 21–23 March 2001 "Human Resource Management in Transition".[author unknown] - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 26 (4):363-364.
Ethical Issues in Business: Perspectives from the Business Academic Community.[author unknown] - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 52 (2):141-141.
Erratum: Applying the Principles of Gestalt Theory to Teaching Ethics.[author unknown] - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (11):880-880.
Editorial: Purpose and Policy.Alex C. Michalos - 1982 - Journal of Business Ethics 1 (2):163-163.
Editorial: Purpose and Policy.Alex C. Michalos - 1982 - Journal of Business Ethics 1 (1):1-1.
Editorial: Conferences on Value Inquiry.James B. Wilbur - 1988 - Journal of Business Ethics 7 (6):403-403.
Introduction.Hart Kevin & Hartman Geoffrey - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 51 (2):101-101.
Editorial: Purpose and Policy.Alex C. Michalos - 1982 - Journal of Business Ethics 1 (4):I-I.
Business and Society Review.[author unknown] - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 23 (4):429-429.
Call for papers.Michael-Owen Dr - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 64 (3):iii-iii.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-02-14

Downloads
15 (#952,403)

6 months
13 (#201,401)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references