A problem concerning the definition of `proper name'

Philosophical Quarterly 44 (174):83-89 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

By "proper name" I mean a proper name in Frege's sense, i.e., a singular term. The "problem" mentioned in the title is whether the subject-term of an existential statement can be a proper name. I concentrate on examining some of the existing attempts to define "proper name" and conclude that, whatever answer is given to the question just posed, the authors of these attempts (Dummett, C Wright and B Hale) will have to modify some of their beliefs. My own favored solution is to say that it can, sometimes denoting a non-existent object

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On ostensive definitions.Janina Kotarbinska - 1960 - Philosophy of Science 27 (1):1-22.
In defense of proper functions.Ruth Millikan - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (June):288-302.
Justification in memory knowledge.Andrew Naylor - 1983 - Synthese 55 (2):269 - 286.
The analysis of singular spacetimes.Erik Curiel - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (3):145.
Evaluation of Evidence in Group Selection Debates.Elisabeth A. Lloyd - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:483 - 493.
Causes, conditions and counterfactuals.Tomasz Bigaj - 2005 - Axiomathes 15 (4):599-619.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
64 (#255,103)

6 months
10 (#280,381)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Singular term, subject and predicate.William R. Stirton - 2000 - Philosophical Quarterly 50 (199):191-207.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references