Psychoactive drug use: Expand the scope of outcome assessment

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (6):324-325 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The “hijacking” and “drug instrumentalization” models of psychoactive drug use predict opposite outcomes in terms of adaptive behavior and fitness benefits. Which is the range of applicability of each model? To answer this question, we need more data than those reported by studies focusing on medical, psychiatric, and legal problems in addicted users. An evolutionary analysis requires a much wider focus.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The ethics of psychoactive ads.Michael R. Hyman & Richard Tansey - 1990 - Journal of Business Ethics 9 (2):105 - 114.
A response to 'psychoactive drug prescribing in japan'.John Coverdale - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (2):155-157.
生命的哲学 ‐后基因时代药物筛选策略与传统中药学理论.Xiao Ming Wang - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 44:139-142.
Pain assessment and management in the long-term care setting.David E. Weissman & Sandra Matson - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (1):31-43.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
19 (#802,800)

6 months
4 (#797,974)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Evolutionary explanations of emotions.Randolph M. Nesse - 1990 - Human Nature 1 (3):261-289.

Add more references