Abstract

Plutarch and Seneca, with their works on anger, wanted to educate their readers onthe subject. But who were they, these readers? This article examines and confronts the “model readers” of both works. It argues that Seneca’s model reader belonged to the Roman elite, professionally busy with something else, but turning to philosophy in order to deal with anger in an appropriate way. Plutarch, on the other hand, wrote for Greeks and Romans who were or could be his friends, probably living an active life but interested in and familiar with philosophy throughout their lives.