Science without grammar: scientific reasoning in severe agrammatic aphasia

In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Stich & Michael Siegal (eds.), The Cognitive Basis of Science. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 99 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Yearning for certainty and the critique of medicine as “science”.Mark H. Waymack - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (3):215-229.
What is special about broca's area?Michael T. Ullman & Roumyana Izvorski - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):52-54.
Science and Play.Michael Goldman - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:406-414.
Subjective Probabilities as Basis for Scientific Reasoning?Franz Huber - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (1):101-116.
The Philosophical Grammar of Scientific Practice.Hasok Chang - 2011 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (3):205-221.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-01

Downloads
36 (#446,058)

6 months
13 (#200,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

On Fodor's problem.Peter Carruthers - 2003 - Mind and Language 18 (5):502-523.
Simple heuristics meet massive modularity.Peter Carruthers - 2005 - In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen P. Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents. New York, US: Oxford University Press USA.
Précis of how children learn the meanings of words.Paul Bloom - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1095-1103.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references