Douglas Walton, The New Dialectic. Conversational Contexts of Argument. Toronto: University of Toronto Press (Book Review) [Book Review]

Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (4):305-313 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1023/a:1013803600690

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Douglas Walton, One-Sided Arguments: A Dialectical Analysis of Bias. [REVIEW]Andrew Aberdein - 2001 - Philosophy in Review 21 (2):152-154.
It's All Very Well for You to Talk! Situationally Disqualifying Ad Hominem Attacks.Erik C. W. Krabbe & Douglas Walton - 1993 - Informal Logic 15 (2).
Poisoning the Well.Douglas Walton - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (3):273-307.
Douglas Walton, The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument.M. W. Allen - 1999 - Philosophy in Review 19:293-294.
Douglas Walton, the new dialectic. Conversational contexts of argument. Toronto: University of toronto press (book review). [REVIEW]Bart Verheij - 2001 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (4):305-313.
Valid Ad Hominem Arguments in Philosophy: Johnstone's Metaphilosophical Informal Logic.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 2001 - Informal Logic 21 (1).
The informal logic of mathematical proof.Andrew Aberdein - 2006 - In Reuben Hersh (ed.), 18 Unconventional Essays About the Nature of Mathematics. Springer Verlag. pp. 56-70.
Profiles of Dialogue for Evaluating Arguments from Ignorance.Douglas Walton - 1999 - Argumentation 13 (1):53-71.
Walton, Douglas (1998). Ad Hominem Arguments.John Woods - 2001 - Argumentation 15 (4):503-507.
Argument Has No Function.Jean Goodwin - 2007 - Informal Logic 27 (1):69-90.
Formal Dialectic in Fallacy Inquiry: An Unintelligible Circumscription of Argumentative Rationality? [REVIEW]Louise Cummings - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (2):161-183.
The Limits of the Dialogue Model of Argument.J. Anthony Blair - 1997 - Argumentation 12 (2):325-339.
Locke and Whately on the Argumentum ad Hominem.Henry W. Johnstone - 1996 - Argumentation 10 (1):89-97.
Dialectical and heuristic arguments: presumptions and burden of proof.Fabrizio Macagno - 2010 - In C. Tindale & C. Reed (eds.), Dialectics, Dialogue and Argumentation: An Examination of Douglas Walton's Theories of Reasoning and Argument. College Publications. pp. 45-57.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-25

Downloads
4 (#1,628,455)

6 months
1 (#1,478,781)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references