Scientific Method, Induction, and Probability: The Whewell–De Morgan Debate on Baconianism, 1830s–1850s

Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 14 (1):134-163 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

By focusing on the nineteenth-century debate between William Whewell and Augustus De Morgan on the nature and scope of scientific method and induction, this article captures an important episode in the history of Baconianism. More specifically, it sheds new light on the social and intellectual construction of Francis Bacon as an emblem of modern science and on British Baconianism as part of the creation of a vision of the modern enterprise. A critic of Whewell’s renovated Baconianism and an advocate of an alternative anti-Baconian (or pro-Newtonian) view of science, De Morgan is presented for the first time as a philosopher of science (or metascientist), one who pioneered the application of probability theory to scientific reasoning.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Discoverers' induction.Laura J. Snyder - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (4):580-604.
The Mill-Whewell Debate: Much Ado about Induction.Laura J. Snyder - 1997 - Perspectives on Science 5 (2):159-198.
Whewell’s tidal researches: scientific practice and philosophical methodology.Steffen Ducheyne - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (1):26-40.
William Whewell’s Semantic Account of Induction.Corey Dethier - 2018 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 8 (1):141-156.
Scientific Induction.Ray Scott Percival - 2006 - In Anthony Grayling, Andrew Pyle & Naomi Goulder (eds.), Continuum Encyclopaedia of British Philosophy. Thoemmes. pp. 1619-1622.
The debate between Whewell and Mill on the nature of scientific induction.Malcolm Forster - 2004 - In Dov M. Gabbay, John Woods & Akihiro Kanamori (eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic. Elsevier. pp. 10--93.
Hintikka and Whewell on Aristotelian Induction.Ilkka Niiniluoto - 1994 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 49 (1):49-61.
Hintikka and Whewell on Aristotelian Induction.Ilkka Niiniluoto - 1994 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 49 (1):49-61.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-01-09

Downloads
23 (#685,349)

6 months
23 (#120,782)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lukas M. Verburgt
University of Amsterdam

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations