On Identifying Plausibility and Deliberative Public Policy: Commentary on: “Negotiating Plausibility: Intervening in the Future of Nanotechnology”

Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):739-742 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The identification of plausible epistemic approaches in science as well as the social problem definitions with which scientists implicitly work is essential for the quality of a deliberative public policy. While responding to the Nanofutures project, I will reflect on the essential elements of such a policy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Identifying Plausibility and Deliberative Public Policy.René Schomberg - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):739-742.
Rhetoric and the Public Sphere.Simone Chambers - 2009 - Political Theory 37 (3):323-350.
Does public ignorance defeat deliberative democracy? [REVIEW]Robert B. Talisse - 2004 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 16 (4):455-463.
Why Deliberative Democracy is (Still) Untenable.Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij - 2012 - Public Affairs Quarterly 26 (3):199-220.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
18 (#837,580)

6 months
2 (#1,206,262)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rene Von Schomberg
Aachen University of Technology

Citations of this work

Editorial Overview.Erik Fisher - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):607-620.

Add more citations