Moral Responsibility Invariantism

Philosophia 39 (1):179-200 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Moral responsibility invariantism is the view that there is a single set of conditions for being morally responsible for an action (or omission or consequence of an act or omission) that applies in all cases. I defend this view against some recent arguments by Joshua Knobe and John Doris

Similar books and articles

The responsibility of the psychopath revisited.Neil Levy - 2007 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 14 (2):pp. 129-138.
Moral Responsibility and Subverting Causes.Andy Taylor - 2010 - Dissertation, University of Reading
Responsibility, control, and omissions.John Martin Fischer - 1997 - The Journal of Ethics 1 (1):45-64.
Variantism about responsibility.John M. Doris, Joshua Knobe & Robert L. Woolfolk - 2007 - Philosophical Perspectives 21 (1):183–214.
Control, intentional action, and moral responsibility.Frank Hindriks - 2011 - Philosophical Psychology 24 (6):787 - 801.
Responsibility.Joshua Knobe & John M. Doris - 2010 - In John M. Doris (ed.), Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-05

Downloads
148 (#128,035)

6 months
14 (#184,493)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brandon Warmke
Bowling Green State University

References found in this work

Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility.John Martin Fischer & Mark Ravizza - 1998 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Mark Ravizza.
Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 1962 - Proceedings of the British Academy 48:187-211.
Moral dimensions: permissibility, meaning, blame.Thomas Scanlon - 2008 - Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments.R. Jay Wallace - 1994 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1969 - Journal of Philosophy 66 (23):829-839.

View all 36 references / Add more references