Whether and How We Will Continue to Reproduce Ourselves

Journal of Religious Ethics 51 (4):639-651 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The author examines two open questions for religious ethicists: whether continuing to have children is a bad idea, given the challenges of antinatalism and climate change, and how we should evaluate the future of reproductive technology. Kao responds to these questions without resolving them by drawing upon human rights, the reproductive justice framework, and principles of social justice.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/jore.12459

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Framing gestation: assistance, delegation, and beyond.Ji-Young Lee - 2022 - Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (7):448-449.
Ectogenesis: Artificial Womb Technology and the Future of Human Reproduction.Scott Gelfand & John R. Shook - 2006 - Rodopi.
Artificial Wombs and the Ectogenesis Conversation: A Misplaced Focus? Technology, Abortion, and Reproductive Freedom.Elizabeth Chloe Romanis & Claire Horn - 2020 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 13 (2):174-194.
Ectogenesis: A reply to Singer and Wells.David N. James - 1987 - Bioethics 1 (1):80-99.
In vitro gametogenesis and reproductive cloning: Can we allow one while banning the other?Seppe Segers, Guido Pennings, Wybo Dondorp, Guido de Wert & Heidi Mertes - 2018 - Bioethics 33 (1):68-75.
Equitable access to ectogenesis for sexual and gender minorities.Laura L. Kimberly, Megan E. Sutter & Gwendolyn P. Quinn - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (4):338-345.
Drawing the line on in vitro gametogenesis.Lauren Notini, Christopher Gyngell & Julian Savulescu - 2019 - Bioethics 34 (1):123-134.
The Morality of Artificial Womb Technology.David T. Reiber - 2010 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 10 (3):515-527.
Artificial reproduction technologies (RTs) – all the way to the artificial womb?Frida Simonstein - 2006 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 9 (3):359-365.
Detached from Humanity: Artificial Gestation and the Christian Dilemma.Daniel Rodger & Bruce P. Blackshaw - forthcoming - Christian Bioethics.
Neonatal incubator or artificial womb? Distinguishing ectogestation and ectogenesis using the metaphysics of pregnancy.Elselijn Kingma & Suki Finn - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (4):354-363.
Ethics Considerations Regarding Artificial Womb Technology for the Fetonate.Felix R. De Bie, Sarah D. Kim, Sourav K. Bose, Pamela Nathanson, Emily A. Partridge, Alan W. Flake & Chris Feudtner - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (5):67-78.
Partial ectogenesis: freedom, equality and political perspective.Elizabeth Chloe Romanis - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (2):89-90.
Reproductive choice.Rebecca Bennett & John Harris - 2007 - In Rosamond Rhodes, Leslie Francis & Anita Silvers (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Medical Ethics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 201–219.
Commentary on Romanis’ Assisted Gestative Technologies.Evie Kendal - 2022 - Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (7):450-451.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-10-26

Downloads
22 (#712,914)

6 months
20 (#132,777)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Conceiving selves.Mary Nickel - 2021 - Journal of Religious Ethics 49 (2):337-357.
Person‐shaped holes.Rebecca J. Epstein-Levi - 2021 - Journal of Religious Ethics 49 (2):226-244.
Seana Valentine Shiffrin.Seana Valentine Shiffrin - 1999 - Legal Theory 5 (2):117-148.

View all 8 references / Add more references