The Problem of the Sadanpujungjŏl 四端不中節 in the Four-Seven Debate

Philosophy East and West 66 (3):805-817 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Sadanch’iljŏng nonbyŏn 四端七情論辨, or Sach’il nonbyŏn 四七論辨, for short, primarily refers to a debate that began in the form of a correspondence between Yi Hwang and Ki Tae-sŭng in sixteenth-century Korea.1 It is generally agreed that the Four-Seven Debate “was a great theoretical achievement” and “also set an excellent example in the pursuit of philosophical discussions” in Korea.2 It was the most famous and influential debate in the history of Korean Neo-Confucianism, bringing about vigorous scholarly discussion and resulting in the formation of two major competing schools, the T’oegye School and the Yulgok School....

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How to Interpret Correctly "One Divides into Two".Wang Zhengping - 1980 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 12 (1):70-88.
""Can" Li" Be Active?Ning-Huei Lee - 2005 - Modern Philosophy 2:006.
Did Shilhak School in Chosun Dynasty Make a settlement of Sung-li Debate?Dong-hee Lee - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 9:279-290.
The "four-seven debate" and the school of principle in korea.Xi-de Jin - 1987 - Philosophy East and West 37 (4):347-360.
Explanation, Internalism, and Reasons for Action.David Sobel - 2001 - Social Philosophy and Policy 18 (2):218.
Mind -- body -- spirituality.Harald Walach - 2007 - Mind and Matter 5 (2):215-240.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-07-26

Downloads
17 (#871,839)

6 months
4 (#796,773)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references