A Europe of the Member States or of the Citizens? - Two Philosophical Perspectives on Sovereignty and Rights in the European Community

Abstract

Today’s debate about the EC and its future can be grouped along two main lines. On the one side are those who hold that the EC is a grouping of sovereign states for the purposes of international cooperation. On the other side are those who maintain that the EC is a new political society that unites the citizens of Europe in a new political and legal community where the question of the sovereignty of the Member States must be reassessed. The aim of the dissertation is to investigate, from a political philosophy perspective, what explanatory values the theories of the Enlightenment, in particular the theories of English philosophers Hobbes and Locke have for the structure of the EC and the contemporary debate about it. It is the question of sovereignty that dominates within the standpoint which sees the EC as a “Europe of the states”. The key components of this concept are, in turn, power and control. The view that sees the EC as “a Europe of citizens” departs from the position that the EC is a European political society founded at the behest of individuals, and that it exists in parallel with other political societies of which individuals are part. The Community puts at the disposal of citizens a common legislator and a common judge, both of whom may be regarded as charged with fulfilling a trusteeship function in relation to the citizens. There are a number of questions of importance. The first is whether the EC is a political society . If the EC does not constitute a political society, the question arises what function is fulfilled by the EC, and what relation exists between the EC and its Member States. Should the question whether the EC is a political society be answered in the affirmative, the next to arise is what requirements it must meet in order to be a legitimate political society. A consequential question is then whether the EC in its present form does indeed meet those requirements of legitimacy. Two models are presented in the dissertation: the Member State model and the European Citizen model. The first model takes its departure in the conception of the EC as an association of sovereign states and is based on the theory of sovereignty. The other model is based on the conception of the EC as a political society dependent on a mandate from individuals and parallel with other political societies of which they are part. Along with the Member State model and the European Citizen model consideration will also be given to a conceivable intermediate model based on the idea of sovereignty divided between Member States and the Community. The questions dealt with in the final part of the dissertation are the purpose of the EC, its structure, the citizens and EC legitimacy, the criteria for the sharing of competence between the EC and its Member States, and finally the question of the protection of the rights of individuals in the EC

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Veil Politics in Liberal Democratic States.Ajume Hassan Wingo - 1997 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
Sovereignty, Cosmopolitanism and the Ethics of European Foreign Policy.Lea Ypi - 2008 - European Journal of Political Theory 7 (3):349-364.
The new constitution as european 'demoi‐cracy'?Kalypso Nicolaïdis - 2004 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 7 (1):76-93.
Jurisprudential dilemmas of european law.Bert Van Roermund - 1997 - Law and Philosophy 16 (4):357-376.
Multi-Level Democracy.Christoph Möllers - 2011 - Ratio Juris 24 (3):247-266.
The International Community as Moral Agent.Karen Kovach - 2003 - Journal of Military Ethics 2 (2):99-106.
Jurisprudential dilemmas of european law.B. Roermund - 1997 - Law and Philosophy 16 (4):357-376.
Introduction: Domination, migration and non-citizens.Iseult Honohan & Marit Hovdal-Moan - 2014 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17 (1):1-9.
An essay on the modern state.A. John Simmons - 2000 - Philosophical Review 109 (2):271-273.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-06-19

Downloads
3 (#1,715,951)

6 months
1 (#1,478,781)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references