Three counter-strategies to reductionism in science

In John B. Cobb & David Ray Griffin (eds.), Mind in Nature. University Press of America. pp. 43 (1977)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reductionism revisited.A. C. Scott - 1998 - Journal of Consciousness Studies (2):51-68.
Can a reductionist be a pluralist?Daniel Steel - 2004 - Biology and Philosophy 19 (1):55-73.
Science without reduction.Helmut F. Spinner - 1973 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 16 (1-4):16 – 94.
Is the brain a memory box?Anne Jaap Jacobson - 2005 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4 (3):271-278.
Financial interests and research bias.David B. Resnik - 2000 - Perspectives on Science 8 (3):255-285.
Dupre's anti-essentialist objection to reductionism.D. Gene Witmer - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (211):181-200.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
15 (#951,632)

6 months
1 (#1,478,781)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references