Results for 'Omberto Cicchetti'

13 found
Order:
  1.  19
    On peer review: “We have met the enemy and he is us”.Domenic V. Cicchetti - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):205-205.
  2.  78
    The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation.Domenic V. Cicchetti - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):119-135.
  3.  24
    On viewing the evidence for primate handedness: Some biostatistical considerations.Domenic V. Cicchetti - 1987 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (2):268-269.
  4.  29
    Reflections from the peer review mirror.Domenic V. Cicchetti - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):167-186.
  5.  17
    Reflections on Carroll Izard’s Contributions: Influences on Diverse Scientific Disciplines and Personal Recollections.Dante Cicchetti - 2015 - Emotion Review 7 (2):104-109.
    Carroll Izard’s theoretical and empirical work has played a preeminent role in energizing the renascence in the study of the emotions and emotional development in normality and pathology. A brief historical overview of his career is presented. Izard’s differential emotions theory has exerted influence in a number of domains and disciplines. Illustrations are provided from research and prevention in developmental psychology and developmental psychopathology. Personal recollections of Cal Izard are provided showing that Izard is not only an influential theoretician and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  6.  52
    Referees, editors, and publication practices: Improving the reliability and usefulness of the Peer review system.Domenic V. Cicchetti - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):51-62.
    The documented low levels of reliability of the peer review process present a serious challenge to editors who must often base their publication decisions on conflicting referee recommendations. The purpose of this article is to discuss this process and examine ways to produce a more reliable and useful peer review system.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  7.  29
    The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: “It's like déjà vu all over again!”.Domenic V. Cicchetti - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):401-403.
  8. Author's Response-Peer review: Agreement and disagreement.D. V. Cicchetti - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (3):536-536.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  28
    Differentiating between the statistical and substantive significance of ESP phenomena: Delta, kappa, psi, phi, or it's not all Greek to me.Domenic V. Cicchetti - 1987 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (4):577.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  15
    On a model for assessing the security of infantile attachment: Issues of observer reliability and validity.Domenic V. Cicchetti - 1984 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (1):149-150.
  11.  34
    On the insensitivity of the ANOVA to interactions: Some suggested simulations.Domenic V. Cicchetti - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (1):125-126.
  12.  19
    Peer review: Agreement and disagreement. [REVIEW]Domenic V. Cicchetti - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (3):534-536.
    Rl In response to Somit & Peterson's call for multiple journal manuscript submissions, and consistent with Cicchetti (1991a and 1991b), counterarguments are presented. The policy for multiple submissions is difficult to defend scientifically ana would place an unwarranted burden on both reviewers and journal editors. As such the policy is again rejected. R2 As earlier hypothesized, referee agreement on manuscripts submitted to a major journal in chemistry was significantly higher for acceptance than for rejection. This is consistent with the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  13. Domenic V. Cicchetti (1991) the reliability of Peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation. Bbs 14: 119-186. Author's response. [REVIEW]C. Crothers, Rd Luce, Jd Sinclair & Dv Cicchetti - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):398-403.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark