Analytical chemistry and the ‘big’ scientific instrumentation revolution

Annals of Science 50 (3):267-290 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

By a close examination of changes in analytical chemistry between the years 1920 and 1950, I document the case that natural science has undergone and continues to undergo a major revolution. The central feature of this transformation is the rise in importance of scientific instrumentation. Prior to 1920, analytical chemists determined the chemical constitution of some unknown by treating it with a series of known compounds and observing the kind of reactions it underwent. After 1950, analytical chemists determined the chemical constitution of an unknown by using a variety of instruments which allow one to discriminate chemicals in terms of their physical properties. This transformation involved changes in the practice of analytical chemistry. It involved the development of a new family of scientific instrument-making companies, and a new level of capital expenditure necessary to do analytical chemistry. It involved the development of new means to disseminate information about scientific instruments. While I do not document the broader case, these changes have been widespread throughout the natural sciences. It is the rise in the importance of instrumentation which is the key conceptual change in what has been identified as the fourth big scientific revolution

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytical instrumentation and instrumental objectivity.Davis Baird - 2000 - In Nalini Bhushan & Stuart Rosenfeld (eds.), Of Minds and Molecules: New Philosophical Perspectives on Chemistry. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 90--113.
Instruments and rules: R. B. Woodward and the tools of twentieth-century organic chemistry.B. L. - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (1):1-32.
Thomas Kuhn and the chemical revolution.Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 2008 - Foundations of Chemistry 10 (2):101-115.
Extended Thing Knowledge.Mathieu Charbonneau - 2010 - Spontaneous Generations 4 (1):116-128.
“Do We Need a Scientific Revolution.Nicholas Maxwell - 2008 - Journal for Biological Physics and Chemistry 8 (3):95-105.
The instrumental revolution in chemistry.Habil Klaus Hentschel - 2003 - Foundations of Chemistry 5 (2):179-183.
Chromium photophysics – a prototypical case history.Leslie S. Forster - 2006 - Foundations of Chemistry 8 (3):243-254.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
34 (#474,174)

6 months
7 (#441,920)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Davis Baird
Clark University

Citations of this work

Why Was M. S. Tswett’s Chromatographic Adsorption Analysis Rejected?Jonathan Livengood - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (1):57-69.
Revolutions in science, revolutions in chemistry.Jeffrey I. Seeman - 2023 - Foundations of Chemistry 25 (2):321-335.
Editorial 1.Eric R. Scerri - 1999 - Foundations of Chemistry 1 (1):107-109.
Bibliography on philosophy of chemistry.E. R. Scerri - 1997 - Synthese 111 (3):305-324.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations