Hybrid Ethics for Generative AI: Some Philosophical Inquiries on GANs

Humana Mente 16 (44) (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Until now, the mass spread of fake news and its negative consequences have implied mainly textual content towards a loss of citizens' trust in institutions. Recently, a new type of machine learning framework has arisen, Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) – a class of deep neural network models capable of creating multimedia content (photos, videos, audio) that simulate accurate content with extreme precision. While there are several areas of worthwhile application of GANs – e.g., in the field of audio-visual production, human-computer interactions, satire, and artistic creativity – their deceptive uses, at least as currently foreseeable, are just as numerous and worrying. The main concern is linked to the so-called “deepfakes”, fake images or videos that simulate real events with extreme precision. When trained on a human face, GANs can make the face assume hyper-realistic movements, expressions and (verbal and non-verbal) communication abilities. This technology poses an urgent threat to the governance of democratic processes concerning the production of public opinions and political discourses, with significant potential for reality-altering and disinformation. After a short introduction of their current technical state-of-the-art, in this paper we want to enquire the GANs` socio-technical system alongside different and intertwined philosophical accounts. Firstly, we will argue about the conditions that make perceived a GANs-generated content as trustworthy, arguing also about the general effects GANs might have on the perceived trustworthiness of individuals. Thereafter, we will discuss about the inadequacy to approach GANs only as perception-altering technology. Against this backdrop, we will propose a theoretical turn that considers the human-machine relationships of trustworthiness as elements of a broader hybrid socio-technical systems. This turn come up with political repercussions that we will discuss in the last part of the paper.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mechanisms and generative material models.Sim-Hui Tee - 2019 - Synthese 198 (7):6139-6157.
Special Conference on Eduard Gans.Michael H. Hoffheimer - 1995 - The Owl of Minerva 27 (1):120-122.
A Comment on Jeremy Waldron's "Lucky in Your Judge".Chaim Gans - 2008 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 9 (1):33-37.
Creativity.Peter Langland-Hassan - 2020 - In Explaining Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 262-296.
Generative Models.Sim-Hui Tee - 2020 - Erkenntnis 88 (1):23-41.
Hybrid Theories.Christopher Woodard - 2015 - In Guy Fletcher (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Well-Being. Routledge. pp. 161-174.
Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts.Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, George Lasson & Eduard Gans - 1911 - Leipzig: F. Meiner. Edited by Georg Lasson & Eduard Gans.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-01-01

Downloads
25 (#637,002)

6 months
25 (#115,879)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Piercosma Bisconti
Scuola Superiore di Studi Universitari e di Perfezionamento Sant'Anna

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references