Four Arguments for Physician-Assisted Suicide and the Objections of Gorsuch

In Hon-Lam Li (ed.), Lanson Lectures in Bioethics (2016–2022): Assisted Suicide, Responsibility, and Pandemic Ethics. Springer Nature Switzerland. pp. 51-73 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter first presents two arguments for the permissibility of physician-assisted suicide (PAS) and euthanasia (E) to eliminate physical suffering. I then present a third argument for PAS and E on grounds other than eliminating suffering. The chapter next considers several objections to these arguments that might be raised by Neil Gorsuch, now a US Supreme Court Justice. In the course of this I present a fourth argument for PAS and E. (I assume throughout that a patient’s free and informed consent is required and present.)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,611

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Voluntary Euthanasia, Suicide, and Physician‐Assisted Suicide.Brian Stoffell - 2009 - In Helga Kuhse & Peter Singer (eds.), A Companion to Bioethics. Oxford, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 312–320.
Does physician assisted suicide violate the integrity of medicine?Richard Momeyer - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (1):13-24.
Physician-Assisted Suicide: Where to Draw the Line?Ernlé W. D. Young - 2000 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9 (3):407-410.
Faith and Reason and Physician-Assisted Suicide.Christopher Kaczor - 1998 - Christian Bioethics 4 (2):183-201.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-02

Downloads
24 (#662,338)

6 months
24 (#119,438)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Frances Kamm
Harvard University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references