Design culture for Sustainable urban artificial intelligence: Bruno Latour and the search for a different AI urbanism

Ethics and Information Technology 26 (1):1-12 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate the relationship between AI urbanism and sustainability by drawing upon some key concepts of Bruno Latour’s philosophy. The idea of a sustainable AI urbanism - often understood as the juxtaposition of smart and eco urbanism - is here critiqued through a reconstruction of the conceptual sources of these two urban paradigms. Some key ideas of smart and eco urbanism are indicated as incompatible and therefore the fusion of these two paradigms is assessed as an unstable basis for shaping sustainable AI urbanism. The concepts in question - modernity, science and nature – are subsequently redefined following Latour’s philosophical perspective, in an attempt to define a different theoretical basis for a sustainable AI urbanism in the Anthropocene. Finally, the principles of a design philosophy shaped by Latour are used to change the design culture that informs AI urbanism towards a more sustainable practice. This paper constructs and promotes a dialogue between the disciplines of philosophy and urban theory with urban design in the conviction that the principles produced by the former and the practices carried out by the latter must start a biunivocal relationship. The paper reveals that in order to change design culture in the field of AI urbanism, it is necessary to rethink some of the key ideas that inform the Western and modern worldview through novel philosophical reflections.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,963

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Recent books of interest.Herman T. Tavani - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (1):83-85.
E-democracy, E-Contestation and the Monitorial Citizen.Jeroen Hoven - 2005 - Ethics and Information Technology 7 (2):51-59.
Artificial intelligence and responsibility gaps: what is the problem?Peter Königs - 2022 - Ethics and Information Technology 24 (3):1-11.
Instructions for Authors.[author unknown] - 2001 - Ethics and Information Technology 3 (2):151-154.
Instructions for Authors.[author unknown] - 2003 - Ethics and Information Technology 5 (4):239-242.
Instructions for Authors.[author unknown] - 2000 - Ethics and Information Technology 2 (4):257-260.
Instructions for authors.[author unknown] - 2002 - Ethics and Information Technology 4 (1):93-96.
Instructions for Authors.[author unknown] - 2001 - Ethics and Information Technology 3 (4):303-306.
Instructions for Authors.[author unknown] - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (1):87-90.
Editorial.[author unknown] - 2005 - Ethics and Information Technology 7 (2):49-49.
Governing (ir)responsibilities for future military AI systems.Liselotte Polderman - 2023 - Ethics and Information Technology 25 (1):1-4.
The ethics of hacking. Ross W. Bellaby.Cécile Fabre - 2023 - Ethics and Information Technology 25 (3):1-4.
The Ethics of AI in Human Resources.Evgeni Aizenberg & Matthew J. Dennis - 2022 - Ethics and Information Technology 24 (3):1-3.
Correction to: the Ethics of AI in Human Resources.Evgeni Aizenberg & Matthew J. Dennis - 2023 - Ethics and Information Technology 25 (1):1-1.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-02-15

Downloads
12 (#1,085,763)

6 months
12 (#213,693)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?